Response
to parts of the Officer’s Report.
Point
No 12
The Officers Report states the following as supporting this
Application
1)
Core Strategy policy P2 of the Bolton Core Strategy states
that the Council will plan for
additional
convenience floor space of up to 10,000
m² in town, district and local centres where local
communities have good access.
Response:- This needs to be qualified.
Bolton Core Strategy states the
following:-
“Retail and Leisure
4.14 The Core Strategy
proposes to increase the quantity of retail floor space in the borough,
concentrated mostly in Bolton town centre. This
reflects the objective of creating a transformed
and vibrant town centre,
as well as complying with Government advice contained in PPS4.
This approach is
supported by the findings of the council’s Retail and Leisure Study. This
identifies a requirement up to 2026, of between 9,200 and 11,000 square metres for ‘convenience’ goods
and between 74,300 and 134,600 square metres for ‘comparison’ goods,
in addition to schemes that already have planning permission.
This additional floor
space should be developed after 2016.”
This in itself needs further
qualification in as much as the BRLS figures identify schemes that already have
planning permission as being Sainsbury’s –Cricketers Way and Central Street
Bolton.
It does not include the
recently opened Tesco at Longcauseway Farnworth.
Including this development but ignoring
the various other smaller Supermarkets which have been built since then and
recalculating the figures from the BRLS the result is as follows:- (See
Appendix)
The Bolton Core Strategy is saying that
there is no need for additional Convenience retail floorspace until after
2016.
The recalculated figures show that thereafter – between 2016 and 2021 there is a need for an extra 1,130 sq metres. (See Appendix)
This is 598 sq metres less than the proposed 1,728 sq metres proposed for Pennine Pets.
The statement in the Retail and Planning document and in the Officers report fails to qualify the figure of 10,000 sq metres with the time frame and the additional capacity already built (by Tesco) since the Retail and Leisure Report. It is therefore misleading.
The recalculated figures show that thereafter – between 2016 and 2021 there is a need for an extra 1,130 sq metres. (See Appendix)
This is 598 sq metres less than the proposed 1,728 sq metres proposed for Pennine Pets.
The statement in the Retail and Planning document and in the Officers report fails to qualify the figure of 10,000 sq metres with the time frame and the additional capacity already built (by Tesco) since the Retail and Leisure Report. It is therefore misleading.
Conclusion
This part of the statement in Core
Strategy Policy P2 thus cannot justify the need for this development
in 2013 and is irrelevant to the Application.
No comments:
Post a Comment